Wong v Beaumont Property Trust Ltd

Wong v Beaumont Property Trust Ltd
Court	Court of Appeal
Citation(s)	[1965] 1 QB 173
Keywords
Easements

Wong v Beaumont Property Trust Ltd [1965] 1 QB 173 is an English land law case, concerning easements.

Facts

Mr Wong leased a basement for his Chinese restaurant, Chopstick, 83 and 84 Queen Street, Exeter. The lease said he should control all smells, comply with health regulations and not cause nuisance to the landlord or other occupiers. The vent was inadequate, a larger flue needed. The landlord objected.

Judgment

Lord Denning MR held that an easement could be implied so Mr Wong could comply with his obligations under the lease. He cited Pwllbach Colliery Co Ltd v Woodman on common intentions and said, ‘That is the principle which underlies all easements of necessity.’^[1]

Cases on easements

Aldred's Case (1610) 9 Co Rep 57

Hill v Tupper (1863) 2 H & C 121

Re Ellenborough Park [1956] Ch 131

London and Blenheim Ltd v Ladbroke Ltd [1993] 4 All ER 157

Phipps v Pears [1965] 1 QB 76

Moncrieff v Jamieson [2007] UKHL 42.

Das v Linden Mews Ltd [2002] EWCA Civ 590

LPA 1925 ss 1(2) 62 and 65(1)

Wheeldon v Burrows (1879) 12 Ch D 31

Wong v Beaumont Property Trust [1965] 1 BE 173

Pwllbach Colliery v Woodman [1915] AC 624

Kent v Kavanagh [2006] EWCA Civ 162

Green v Lord Somerleyton [2003] EWCA Civ 198

Hair v Gillman (2000) 80 P&CR 108

Prescription Act 1832 ss 2-3

Land Charges Act 1972 s 2(5)(d)(iii)

LRA 2002 s 27(2)(a) and Sch 3, para 3

Crow v Wood [1971] 1 QB 77

Crabb v Arun District Council [1975] EWCA Civ 7

R (Barkas) v North Yorkshire CC [2014] UKSC 31

Notes

↑ [1965] 1 QB 173, 180

References

External links

This article is issued from Wikipedia - version of the 5/18/2016. The text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share Alike but additional terms may apply for the media files.